Hair is such an emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we would like we can’t have and what we’ve we don’t want! Curly hair and we would like straight, straight hair and we would like curly, brunette and we would like blonde, blonde and we would like red. Likewise upper lip hair on a female, so valued as a sign of exquisite beauty using elements of the entire world, is vilified by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is just a common problem affecting the majority of women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the use of various temporary methods of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it’s often followed closely by feelings of poor self confidence, an expression of isolation and low self worth.
Because the occasions when bearded ladies in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to remove any trace of hair from any and every part of their body as they feel it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it’s not merely women which can be now affected… increasingly the male gender is at the mercy of pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair can be just like vilified by the male population nowadays since the female.
Different Types of Hair Removal
Superfluous hair growth can be brought on by many factors, such as for example, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the sole permanent approach to hair removal, is cure that’s in great demand by female and transsexual clients and more recently, as a result of society’s attitudes, the number of male clients is increasing.
To meet up this need there as been many hair removal measures some of which go back centuries in history. Hair removal has existed since caveman times but interestingly the elements of your body we are removing hair from have differed within the ages. Removing hair from the top and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes but for survival. There is evidence that cavemen did this but additionally the ancient Egyptians and it had been undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the top would take away the benefit of an adversary having anything to grab onto in addition to having less mites!
In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. In reality these women removed most of their body hair, with the exception of eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It had been also considered uncivilized for guys to own hair on the face. Undesired facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of an individual of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a form of razors made of flint or bronze since the razor was not invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.
Additionally they used a way of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) could be applied to the skin, a reel of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – the same of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There clearly was also another technique used called threading which is recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn could be placed through the fingers of both hands, and quickly stroked within the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. During the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of their eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads in order to give the appearance of a longer brow and forehead was fashionable. It is startling to see the most obvious influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from the beginning.
Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are temporary methods that many people try today. In reality new hair removal devices seem to appear like buses – every 20 minutes roughly! However, technology has managed to move on and with it, it appears that there are some restricted and doubtful methods of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods are in a restricted category since the former has been banned in some countries such as the USA and the latter are just in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are some of the doubtful methods in that there surely is no established data on the effectiveness.
Electrolysis continues to be the sole proven permanent approach to hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited from this tried and trusted treatment. It is usually the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a remarkable transformation in their clients, from a timid, introverted personality at the start of a program of treatments, to a confident and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.
Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ within our Western society is a variable million pound industry. This type of huge money making machine though could have a lot more than its fair share of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none of which relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its fair share of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.
Hair Removal methods are both permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this particular in mind there is just one system in the marketplace today that can totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because of its longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that’s electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for all hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It continues to be utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting a healthcare facility laser hair removal departments. It is also considered an important tool in the task of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It offers cosmetic relief for the consumer with mild hirsute problems to the patient with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require many hours of treatment.
Apparently there’s been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what the language ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached that when the hairs that have been removed do not grow back for an amount of one year after the last treatment, permanent reduction can be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains to this day, the main one method legally permitted to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.
The newer technologies such as for example LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for all permanent hair removal. This, it’s now realised, are at best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The truth is that this is wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ are far more realistic. The stark reality is that whilst they’ve their successes they likewise have their limitations – they cannot treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.
Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ although not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The stark reality is that newer technology is brilliant for big areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it really simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there is no melanin remaining in the hair for this to target. In addition to this, for unknown reason(s) not all the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The rest of the 5% – 15% hair will undoubtedly be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but still stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the sole option of ‘permanent hair removal’ right down to additional electrolysis treatment to accomplish the job. Laser and IPL are actually recognised to be a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.
Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators use a burst of filtered light aimed at one hair at a time. Following the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light used in the device is targeted against the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. Allow this method, fibre-optic probes were inserted into the hair follicle through which the light was flashed. There is no clinical data published so far to support any permanency claims and there is no established data on its effectiveness.
The tweezer method having its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was initially patented in 1959. This technique functions by passing an electric current through the tweezers, which holds the hair on the surface of the skin by grasping them for a number of minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations since the claim of electricity destroying the basis of the hair doesn’t have scientific backup.
Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published currently to ascertain the declare that permanent hair removal is achievable using these methods. In 1985 when the use of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches instead of cotton swabs were introduced and a name change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the idea of direct current (DC) 脫毛推薦 for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the use of a needle. A DC electric current is passed by way of a conductive gel on the surface of the skin via an adhesive patch positioned on the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the electric current that travels right down to the hair follicle.
To date no clinical data can be obtained and the laws of physics do not support the claims created by the manufacturers. Hair does not conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it will spread along the surface of the skin rather than passing through the hair. Therefore, much like the tweezer method, the argument that it will reach the basis of the hair to destroy it doesn’t have scientific backup.
Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the process they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It is stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and do not dissipate into the skin prevents any side effects.
Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to be the ‘next generation of long haul hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material that it is ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in the same follicle proving that this can be a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA has not given the outcome currently regarding a credit card applicatoin to promote in April 2010 of the most recent device.